🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where Black people are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the risks that face all if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.